Wikipedia is NOT a "public forum". It is a website
run >by a private
organisation. You agreed that you would abide by
certain >terms and
conditions; if you have broken those terms and conditions, you have no legal comeback.
Alphax
Aha! Yes he does have his comeback, if Wiki itself has broken either its own self-described terms or another law, towards him. Good luck to him: you've been asking for it with your gloating claims to be above every law in the world.
___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
Wikipedia is NOT a "public forum". It is a website run by a private organisation. You agreed that you would abide by certain terms and conditions; if you have broken those terms and conditions, you have no legal comeback.
Alphax
Aha! Yes he does have his comeback, if Wiki itself has broken either its own self-described terms or another law, towards him. Good luck to him: you've been asking for it with your gloating claims to be above every law in the world.
If that were true, you would, of course, have the same recourse.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
MAURICE FRANK wrote:
Wikipedia is NOT a "public forum". It is a website
run >by a private
organisation. You agreed that you would abide by
certain >terms and
conditions; if you have broken those terms and conditions, you have no legal comeback.
Alphax
Aha! Yes he does have his comeback, if Wiki itself has broken either its own self-described terms or another law, towards him. Good luck to him: you've been asking for it with your gloating claims to be above every law in the world.
"Hey Calvin, what are the rules again?"
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \