To play devil's advocate here. Most of his really whacky stuff is on the talk pages of articles rather than the article itself. He has never made an edit to cold fusion for example (AFAIK) only the talk page. I've been participating in talk cold fusion and talk dolphin brain, and although there has been much mumbo jumbo I didn't spot any personal insults (I am thick skinned however perhaps I didn't spot them).Anyway what I wanted to do was pre-empt any talk of a ban, which I don't believe is appropriate at this time and instead suggest a message be put on his talk page stating what is and what isn't appropriate to put in article pages, talk pages and other user pages.
Theresa
P.S. After rereading Nathan's post, I see that he wasn't actually advocating a ban, but just bringing Krhaus to the attention of the list.
KNOTT, T wrote:
and although there has been much mumbo jumbo I didn't spot any personal insults (I am thick skinned however perhaps I didn't spot them).Anyway what I wanted to do was pre-empt any talk of a ban, which I don't believe is appropriate at this time
A few gems you may have overlooked, these particular examples from User_talk:Someone_else
I strongly suggest you stop mutilating the Skull and Bones article. If you are a member of the [[Black Lodge]], you can fuck off, and if you are, even worse, just an uninformed idiot propogating his dogma, you can shut your fucking mouth.
I strongly suggest you stop mutilating the Skull and Bones article. If you are a member of the [[Black Lodge]], you can fuck off, and if you are, even worse, just an uninformed idiot propogating his dogma, you can shut your fucking mouth.
It's that sort of comment, coupled with his refusal to discuss these issues, which led to his ban.
He has now emailed me, and we'll talk. It seems unlikely that he's willing to give up on the personal attacks, though.
And I have to wonder to what extent his extremely "mumbo jumbo" theories are going to make it impossible for him to accept NPOV anyway.
--Jimbo