Daniel R. Tobias wrote: Of course, the usual general custom on these lists favours bottom posting. The untrimmed portion essentially was stripped down to only my previous response which had been posted on the bottom of his previous top posting. Since my last comments followed immediately upon his own comments then it's obvious that itr was bottom posted. The additional quoted material should then be viewed as nothing more than a footnote. Ec

On 6/23/07, Silas Snider <swsnider(a)gmail.com> wrote: Something which can be hard to do when placing the context of their literal words is made difficult by difficult-to-read posting styles. Johnleemk

On 6/22/07, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gmail.com> wrote: Like pure bottom posting? All I'm trying to say is: I am extremely tired of seeing people spending time on this issue that, in the end, means little. If you cannot figure out what someone is replying to, ask them to restate their statement, rather than ragging on them for not using whatever your preferred style of posting. Sincerely, Silas Snider -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Silas Snider is a proud member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist (AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD) , and the Harmonious Editing Club of Wikipedia. --------------------------------------------------------------------------