On 12 Oct 2006 at 23:18, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
I guess we need to introduce a <sarcasm>...</sarcasm> tag, and maybe also <irony> and <satire> for those who wish to use those things too.
The only problem with that solution is the paradox that when you tag it it's no longer what it's tagged to be.
So we need a <paradox> tag too?
On 10/13/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 12 Oct 2006 at 23:18, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
I guess we need to introduce a <sarcasm>...</sarcasm> tag, and maybe also <irony> and <satire> for those who wish to use those things too.
The only problem with that solution is the paradox that when you tag it it's no longer what it's tagged to be.
So we need a <paradox> tag too?
New slogan: Wikipedia: we really go for the whole semantic web thing!
--Oskar