-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2008, WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 3/6/2008 6:35:58 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
oldakquill(a)gmail.com writes:
This is why I never understood the big deal over userboxes. As a thing
which improves social-aspects of Wikipedia and turns a User: into a
person, it is bound to have a positive effect on the encyclopaedia.>>
0--------------------
I agree with the sentiment that some deletionists are too anal about user
boxes.
Who... Cares ? Leave people alone and get onto something important and
useful :) (The last sentence is said for humourous emphasis and not as a personal
attack against any person living, dead or fictional.)
At any rate. This makes me wonder if we could set up an off-project "social
networking" site just for Wikipedians. You'd link from here to there and
back seemlessly. It seems like it *could* address both sides of the situation.
Certainly after single user login is implemented, a
project-independent social site could be set up under Wikimedia, if
there were support. User pages under SUL could be held at this project
and transcluded (or directly included like Commons images). User pages
could be translated into different languages and default interface
settings could determine which language is presented to the user.
Also, the new SocialProfile extension and FOAF could add useful
functionality to the project.
- --
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org
iD8DBQFH0DVgWNupeezvVkYRAll4AKCmba8G5+Fzti0RBjJ23TM+U3pdkQCg17n1
SKkvb3rErXZ0hE9wbDjJNdQ=
=qJMs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----