(I'm sorry if this topic has already been beaten to death on this list; WikiEN-l was entirely overwhelming to me until I recently started using Gmane, so I haven't been keeping up.)
Hello all,
I'm writing to try to gauge the community's feeling on an issue that has been nagging me for a while. I am a resident of [[Geneseo (town), New York]] and [[Geneseo (village), New York]], and cannot come up with a good reason for why these should be separate articles. I realize that the village and town are, in a legal sense, different entities; the division between the two in the census data is why Rambot created two articles.
In any context other than a strictly legal one, however, both the town and village are simply "Geneseo", and I believe that Wikipedia should reflect that fact with a single unified page. That article would of course include the census (Rambot) data from both legal entities, and a section explaining the difference between the two, but I believe that the current situation—with two articles—leads to duplication and redundancy of data, or its opposite, unsynchronized or inconsistent data.
I realize that any changes to the relevant policy would extend beyond this one pair of articles—the Livingston County infobox at the bottom of the Geneseo article indicates seven other town/village pairs, and it seems probable that there are hundreds of analogous situations in New York alone. However, I thought I would try to judge the community opinion on this particular matter: should Wikipedia describe reality de facto when that is more accurate and useful than describing it de jure?
Thanks for any feedback,
[[en:User:Bdesham]]
Benjamin Esham wrote:
(I'm sorry if this topic has already been beaten to death on this list; WikiEN-l was entirely overwhelming to me until I recently started using Gmane, so I haven't been keeping up.)
Hello all,
I'm writing to try to gauge the community's feeling on an issue that has been nagging me for a while. I am a resident of [[Geneseo (town), New York]] and [[Geneseo (village), New York]], and cannot come up with a good reason for why these should be separate articles. I realize that the village and town are, in a legal sense, different entities; the division between the two in the census data is why Rambot created two articles.
In any context other than a strictly legal one, however, both the town and village are simply "Geneseo", and I believe that Wikipedia should reflect that fact with a single unified page. That article would of course include the census (Rambot) data from both legal entities, and a section explaining the difference between the two, but I believe that the current situation—with two articles—leads to duplication and redundancy of data, or its opposite, unsynchronized or inconsistent data.
I realize that any changes to the relevant policy would extend beyond this one pair of articles—the Livingston County infobox at the bottom of the Geneseo article indicates seven other town/village pairs, and it seems probable that there are hundreds of analogous situations in New York alone. However, I thought I would try to judge the community opinion on this particular matter: should Wikipedia describe reality de facto when that is more accurate and useful than describing it de jure?
Thanks for any feedback,
[[en:User:Bdesham]]
I don't think a one-size-fits-all approach is advisable. For Geneseo, it may make sense to have a single article about Geneseo, New York, but in other cases it might not. There are some NY towns where the village or city with the same name happens to be only one of several municipalities within the town. There have been some other articles where separate Census entities have been merged together in the same article, or in some other cases, the demographic details are left in the separate articles while cultural and other aspects are treated in a third combined article (i.e., there would be [[Geneseo (village), New York]] and [[Geneseo (town), New York]] with the Rambot-generated statistics for each and then [[Geneseo, New York]] would treat the cultural area as a combined entity with links to the other two for the statistics). IMO, any of the approaches are OK, but it depends in large part on a familiarity with the area to make a determination.
Bkonrad
Benjamin Esham wrote:
(I'm sorry if this topic has already been beaten to death on this list; WikiEN-l was entirely overwhelming to me until I recently started using Gmane, so I haven't been keeping up.)
Hello all,
I'm writing to try to gauge the community's feeling on an issue that has been nagging me for a while. I am a resident of [[Geneseo (town), New York]] and [[Geneseo (village), New York]], and cannot come up with a good reason for why these should be separate articles. I realize that the village and town are, in a legal sense, different entities; the division between the two in the census data is why Rambot created two articles.
In any context other than a strictly legal one, however, both the town and village are simply "Geneseo", and I believe that Wikipedia should reflect that fact with a single unified page. That article would of course include the census (Rambot) data from both legal entities, and a section explaining the difference between the two, but I believe that the current situation—with two articles—leads to duplication and redundancy of data, or its opposite, unsynchronized or inconsistent data.
I realize that any changes to the relevant policy would extend beyond this one pair of articles—the Livingston County infobox at the bottom of the Geneseo article indicates seven other town/village pairs, and it seems probable that there are hundreds of analogous situations in New York alone. However, I thought I would try to judge the community opinion on this particular matter: should Wikipedia describe reality de facto when that is more accurate and useful than describing it de jure?
Thanks for any feedback,
[[en:User:Bdesham]]
I wouldn't see any problem, in this case, with just merging the two. Even with good rules, there will be edge cases in which an exception is warranted.
* Todd Allen:
Benjamin Esham wrote:
I'm writing to try to gauge the community's feeling on an issue that has been nagging me for a while. I am a resident of [[Geneseo (town), New York]] and [[Geneseo (village), New York]], and cannot come up with a good reason for why these should be separate articles.
I wouldn't see any problem, in this case, with just merging the two. Even with good rules, there will be edge cases in which an exception is warranted.
Thanks for the responses, everyone. I've gone ahead and merged the two articles. Unfortunately, it seems that some past edits to the pages resulted in the village's Rambot data being lost. Is there any easy way to reconstruct that data, or will I have to sort through the census data manually?
Thanks for any assistance.
On 6/25/07, Benjamin Esham bdesham@gmail.com wrote:
- Todd Allen:
Benjamin Esham wrote:
I'm writing to try to gauge the community's feeling on an issue that
has
been nagging me for a while. I am a resident of [[Geneseo (town), New York]] and [[Geneseo (village), New York]], and cannot come up with a good reason for why these should be separate articles.
I wouldn't see any problem, in this case, with just merging the
two. Even
with good rules, there will be edge cases in which an exception is warranted.
Thanks for the responses, everyone. I've gone ahead and merged the two articles. Unfortunately, it seems that some past edits to the pages resulted in the village's Rambot data being lost. Is there any easy way to reconstruct that data, or will I have to sort through the census data manually?
Thanks for any assistance.
Benjamin D. Esham bdesham@gmail.com | AIM: bdesham128 | Jabber: same as e-mail "As Gregor Samsa woke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself transformed in his bed into a monstrous vermin." — Kafka, /The Metamorphosis/
Isn't it buried in the history somewhere?
* MacGyverMagic/Mgm:
Benjamin Esham wrote:
Unfortunately, it seems that some past edits to the pages resulted in the village's Rambot data being lost. Is there any easy way to reconstruct that data, or will I have to sort through the census data manually?
Isn't it buried in the history somewhere?
Nope, I already checked. A couple of years ago, I carelessly moved some articles, and at some point I must have deleted the version of the village page that contained that data.
Cheers,
Benjamin Esham wrote:
(I'm sorry if this topic has already been beaten to death on this list; WikiEN-l was entirely overwhelming to me until I recently started using Gmane, so I haven't been keeping up.)
Hello all,
I'm writing to try to gauge the community's feeling on an issue that has been nagging me for a while. I am a resident of [[Geneseo (town), New York]] and [[Geneseo (village), New York]], and cannot come up with a good reason for why these should be separate articles. I realize that the village and town are, in a legal sense, different entities; the division between the two in the census data is why Rambot created two articles.
In any context other than a strictly legal one, however, both the town and village are simply "Geneseo", and I believe that Wikipedia should reflect that fact with a single unified page. That article would of course include the census (Rambot) data from both legal entities, and a section explaining the difference between the two, but I believe that the current situation—with two articles—leads to duplication and redundancy of data, or its opposite, unsynchronized or inconsistent data.
I realize that any changes to the relevant policy would extend beyond this one pair of articles—the Livingston County infobox at the bottom of the Geneseo article indicates seven other town/village pairs, and it seems probable that there are hundreds of analogous situations in New York alone. However, I thought I would try to judge the community opinion on this particular matter: should Wikipedia describe reality de facto when that is more accurate and useful than describing it de jure?
I brought this up a while ago, and nothing happened: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Political_subdivisions_of_New_York Feel free to resurrect it.
On 6/24/07, Benjamin Esham bdesham@gmail.com wrote:
I'm writing to try to gauge the community's feeling on an issue that has been nagging me for a while. I am a resident of [[Geneseo (town), New York]] and [[Geneseo (village), New York]],..
Apart from the main issue, would [[Geneseo, New York (town)]] and [[Geneseo, New York (village)]] be a more logical way to name the articles?
—C.W.