Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 29, 2015, at 8:01 AM, wikien-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send WikiEN-l mailing list submissions to wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wikien-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at wikien-l-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of WikiEN-l digest..."
Please do NOT hit "reply" to this digest without trimming the quoted section to only the message you are replying to!
Today's Topics:
- Re: Privacy Study Looking for Volunteers (James Alexander)
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 05:38:10 -0700 From: James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Privacy Study Looking for Volunteers Message-ID: CAOcBxPNL6Q2sXujPkuADBXyNbdZNoyao2sTehTsjsgtKrtFLjQ@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The idea of the IP being more private in the history/ public logs (for example a unique hash so that you know it's "an IP" but not where/what IP" ) is one that I know has been discussed and is desired by a good number within the foundation including within legal. I'll try to look for the phabricator task about it tomorrow. I think that's something that is likely to happen, it isn't easy though and requires a fair number of resources to be pointed at it to get it done so it's a question of priorities and convincing those who decide those things that it should be higher. I believe it's something, privacy wise, that legal would really like.
I think it is unlikely in the short to medium term, however, to get rid of the IPs in the backend (in server logs and in the checkuser system for example) because the replacements just aren't there. I've spent a good amount of time thinking of a way to make the checkuser system as usable as necessary without revealing IPs for example (including a consultant who looked a lot but didn't really come up with anything we didn't know already). I think it's doable, but it would be a very difficult and long design process and I think it's unlikely in the near future.
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Kyanos someanon126@gmail.com wrote:
I don't believe a different license is needed. CC licenses can be used for anonymous works: The author is not given and does not have to be credited, but everything else (attribution of the work and share-alike) would stay the same. So a change in the terms of use to the effect of, "Unregistered edits are considered to have no named author," would be sufficient.
Kyanos
On 03/27/2015 06:41 AM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
Perhaps we should move to a different licensing model for future IP edits. CC0 for IP edits would be a more sensible license for edits by an IP where in many cases no-one could attribute the edit to the individual who made it. If people don't want to release their edits as CC0 they can always create an account.
Regards
Jonathan Cardy
On 27 Mar 2015, at 10:28, Elias Friedman elipongo@gmail.com wrote:
It's actually required so as to provide attribution as per the Creative Commons and other licenses we operate under.
Sent from my Droid 4 Elias Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי elipongo@gmail.com "יְהִי אוֹר"
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
End of WikiEN-l Digest, Vol 138, Issue 7