If Geni's interpretation of 3RR is correct, then we have an unwinnable game of tic tac toe going on against editors trying to keep nonsense out of articles. Within four hours: Skyring inserted a falsehood Adam reverted: Adam's #1 revert Skyring re-inserted it: Skyring's #1 revert Adam reverted: Adam's #2 revert Skyring re-inserted it:" Skyring's #2 revert Adam reverted: Adam's #3 revert Skyring re-inserted it: Skyring's #3 revert Adam reverted: Adam's #4 revert. Skyring calls the cops. Given this intepretation of 3RR, there's no way Adam could have kept the material out, except by calling other editors to help him, which he should have done, but it's a bit silly to have to do that over a content dispute that is straighforwardly factual, as it is in this case. But if we're going to concentrate on process and ignore quality, then shouldn't neither or both editors be blocked in this case? Sarah _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l