JT wrote:
... If an expert on an area writes a page that shows that that expert knows what s/he is talking about, why should someone who knows nothing on the topic and may not have heard about the topic until s/he saw the article, have the right to decide that THEY know the correct capitalisation and change everything? ....
Becasue we are a wiki. I also don't like the premise of your statement; our many copyeditors do have a good deal of expertise on the normal rules of grammar, what a proper noun vs a common noun is and also the needs of a wiki like Wikipedia. We also know to defer to well-respected manuals of style on this issue (which prefer down style in mixed environments like an encyclopedia or other general reference). When in doubt we know to read other similar publications and see how they capitalize certain terms. They also use the down style. I'm also a biologist. So your presumption that we "know nothing" is a bit insulting.
.... ...accurate articles I have seen on wiki which have been reduced to semi-literate gibberish by clumsy illinformed editing and screwed capitalisation based on questionable wiki conventions on capitalisation.
And Tannin and I were being so polite to each other. Thanks for reducing this polite discussion to name calling.
Good day.
--mav
Daniel Mayer wrote:
...accurate articles I have seen on wiki which have been reduced to semi-literate gibberish by clumsy illinformed editing and screwed capitalisation based on questionable wiki conventions on capitalisation.
And Tannin and I were being so polite to each other. Thanks for reducing this polite discussion to name calling.
If the only issue between two versions is a matter of capitalization, we are still far from the matter of whether either is gibberish.
Ec