Phil Sandifer wrote
The problem here is that we have two reliabilities in
play.
<snip>
The second is using reliability as the latest code for
notability, In
this case, a standard for notability that is flagrantly different
from the practical standard used in articles is used as a cover for
deleting articles, often being used to ignore the numeric consensus
on AfDs because [[WP:RS]] is cited in [[WP:V]], essentially giving it
a pseudo-policy status, despite its deep flaws.
Deciding notability on the basis of verifiability is very far from a panacea. I wish
people understood that it is faute de mieux, holding a newspaper over your head in a
cloudburst in the absence of an umbrella.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit
www.ntlworld.com/security for more information