Which reminds me (to everybody): Has anybody with that power checked the IP logs for MNH's edits to see if this might be somebody that we've met before? He was quick to point to the weaknesses of our banning procedures and seemed to understand the political wisdom of focusing on RK.
I would like to echo this request. He strikes me as sometbody who is uncannily familiar with the subtleties of Wikipedia politics for a newbie.
I would like to unecho this request. Unless the following questions can be adequately answered:
1. Does it make any difference at all, if he had an account before MNH or not?
2. Exactly what has MNH done, that has a large majority of the involved people thinking he should be banned?
3. Even if you think that he deserves to be banned, why does he deserve to be "outed"?
BL
Bjorn Lindqvist wrote:
I would like to unecho this request. Unless the following questions can be adequately answered:
- Does it make any difference at all, if he had an account before MNH
or not?
- Exactly what has MNH done, that has a large majority of the
involved people thinking he should be banned?
- Even if you think that he deserves to be banned, why does he
deserve to be "outed"?
If MNH is somebody that's already been banned before, then that simplifies the question of banning! (I was specifically reminded of RK's troubles with EoT, who AIUI eventually turned out to be banned user 142.) Otherwise, there is not much point that I can see.
BTW, I don't know what's happened with MNH over the past day or so, so this conversation may be completely out of date by now!
-- Toby
Only if he's a blocked user who is not supposed to be posting any more.
RickK
Bjorn Lindqvist bjrn.lindqvist@telia.com wrote:
1. Does it make any difference at all, if he had an account before MNH or not?
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard