http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Timecop/The_war_on_blogs
I can't *seriously* be the only person on all of Wikipedia who has a major problem with the idea of letting the GNAA (yes, really, *that* GNAA) unilaterally decide whether Wikipedia can or can't have articles about blogs, can I?
Craig, who sure as hell hopes not
Craig Schiller wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Timecop/The_war_on_blogs
I can't *seriously* be the only person on all of Wikipedia who has a major problem with the idea of letting the GNAA (yes, really, *that* GNAA) unilaterally decide whether Wikipedia can or can't have articles about blogs, can I?
Craig, who sure as hell hopes not
As per usual with the GNAA:
YHBT. YHL. HAND.
On 11/16/05, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
Craig Schiller wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Timecop/The_war_on_blogs
I can't *seriously* be the only person on all of Wikipedia who has a major problem with the idea of letting the GNAA (yes, really, *that* GNAA) unilaterally decide whether Wikipedia can or can't have articles about blogs, can I?
Craig, who sure as hell hopes not
We can have articles on pretty much anything as long as we're selective about it and blogs are no different in that regard.
--Mgm