geni wrote:
On 12/8/05, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alan_Dershowitz
As if admins didn't have enough to do already.
A bit of research and writing will keep you in practice ;-)
- d.
On 12/8/05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
geni wrote:
On 12/8/05, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alan_DershowitzAs if admins didn't have enough to do already.
A bit of research and writing will keep you in practice ;-)
- d.
If I was any good at that I wouldn't be an admin.
-- geni
On 12/8/05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
geni wrote:
On 12/8/05, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alan_Dershowitz
Dunno why, but when I saw that name I thought "What is Weird Al Dershowitz complaining about?" I think I'll avoid editing the content for now. I'm going to avoid the temptation to add to the article on "Weird Al" Yankovic the statement: "Weird Al Yankovic is no relation to Al Dershowitz."
On 12/8/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/8/05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
geni wrote:
On 12/8/05, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alan_DershowitzDunno why, but when I saw that name I thought "What is Weird Al Dershowitz complaining about?" I think I'll avoid editing the content for now. I'm going to avoid the temptation to add to the article on "Weird Al" Yankovic the statement: "Weird Al Yankovic is no relation to Al Dershowitz."
Sorry to be blunt, but it seems to me that Jimbo has got some 'splaining to do. I hope he hasn't started morphing into LMS. Jimbo really has done a great job of *staying away from editing individual articles* and deciding to institute policies until recently, so far as I can tell. But then I hadn't been paying much attention of late.
Sorry about that.
Come back to the light, Jimbo, back to the light! You've spent too much time with the nattering nabobs...
On 12/9/05, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to be blunt, but it seems to me that Jimbo has got some 'splaining to do.
Why? Are we building an encyclopedia or just hosting a playpen for anybody to put crap into wiki pages?
Coming from someone who's consistently opposed good faith efforts to make it easier for admins to get rid of crap wiki pages, and, in fact, is at this very moment proposing to not allow crap-but-not-speedy-crap wiki pages to be deleted at all for a month, I find that statement quite amusing.
On 12/8/05 8:55 PM, "Tony Sidaway" f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
Why? Are we building an encyclopedia or just hosting a playpen for anybody to put crap into wiki pages?