Sarah wrote:
Wikipedia Review has made the claim that they have a
checkuser in
their pocket, a claim that was confirmed by one of the few posters
there that I tend to trust. Therefore, in their own interests,
checkusers who post there regularly should make it a point of
principle never to use the tool against editors who are attacked
there, or in whom Wikipedia Review expresses too much of an interest.
*One poster* on WR claimed to have a checkuser in his pocket - link is
here for those who aren't concerned that their eyes will immediately
combust upon reading:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15117
Please stop treating Wikipedia Review monolithically. It is in fact a
good deal less monolithic than Wikipedia (which I don't intend as a
criticism of Wikipedia).