Sarah wrote:

Wikipedia Review has made the claim that they have a checkuser in their pocket, a claim that was confirmed by one of the few posters there that I tend to trust. Therefore, in their own interests, checkusers who post there regularly should make it a point of principle never to use the tool against editors who are attacked there, or in whom Wikipedia Review expresses too much of an interest.

*One poster* on WR claimed to have a checkuser in his pocket - link is here for those who aren't concerned that their eyes will immediately combust upon reading: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15117

Please stop treating Wikipedia Review monolithically. It is in fact a good deal less monolithic than Wikipedia (which I don't intend as a criticism of Wikipedia).