As if conclusive proof were needed, [[Holodomor]] comes under "Disaster management".
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo. _________________________________________________________________ Win New York holidays with Kellogg’s & Live Search http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354033/direct/01/
Eugene van der Pijll schreef:
Christiano Moreschi schreef:
As if conclusive proof were needed, [[Holodomor]] comes under "Disaster management".
No it doesn't. Neither [[Holodomor]] nor [[Category:Holodomor]] has been in [[Category:Disaster management]] for at least the last 24 hours.
I'm sorry, I misread the subject; it's about WikiProject categorisation.
Which I cannot say anything about, since I've switched that useless bit of bureaucracy off years ago.
Eugene
On 10/5/08, Eugene van der Pijll eugene@vanderpijll.nl wrote:
No it doesn't. Neither [[Holodomor]] nor [[Category:Holodomor]] has been in [[Category:Disaster management]] for at least the last 24 hours.
Understanding what people mean usually isn't that hard. Look at [[Talk:Holodomor]], which contains the following bannercruft.
{{calm talk}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1= {{WikiProject Ukraine|class=B|importance=top|nested=yes}} {{WikiProject Russian History|nested=yes}} {{Disaster management|nested=yes}} }}
{{FAOL|Ukrainian|uk:Голодомор в Україні 1932-1933 років}} {{FAOL|Portuguese|pt:Holodomor}} {{WP1.0|v0.7=pass|class=B|category=History}}
Most of this is useless and the rest should be part of the mw interface.
And don't get me started about the color scheme. What is that, "banana mania"?
—C.W.
2008/10/5 Christiano Moreschi moreschiwikiman@hotmail.co.uk:
As if conclusive proof were needed, [[Holodomor]] comes under "Disaster management".
I note that that project defines its scope (albeit after a little digging) as encompassing "... individual disastrous events, e.g. hurricane Katrina and the Ethiopian famine in the 1980s."
Perhaps they could do with a retitling, but I can see how it got there.