Ray Saintonge wrote

After reading through that article and its talk page I can only regard it as so much excess verbiage to be cut severely.

The page was created by amalgamating two, one of which was the old 'vanity' guideline, the other a page on COI created in September and with obvious gaps. The result has had several drastic haircuts since. More concision work required? Yes, but satisfying the need to have a comprehensive guideline comes before boiling it right down. People do dicker on so, making ridculous extrapolations, if you make it very simple.

The problem with my getting involved in such a page is that I would waste a lot of time arguing over things that have little bearing on what I prefer to do.

Better stick to wikien then.

Charles

----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information