[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
Steve
Jesse W wrote:
On Feb 9, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
Pardon the shameless plug, but
[[Warren Beatty/References]] probably has more.
I thought I moved that somewhere. Oh well.
On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:19 AM, Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Jesse W wrote:
On Feb 9, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
Pardon the shameless plug, but
[[Warren Beatty/References]] probably has more.
I thought I moved that somewhere. Oh well.
You did; I just forgot to call it Talk:Warren Beatty/References
Jesse W
At time of writing, [[Medical analysis of circumcision]] has 150 inline refs.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:39 +0100, Steve Bennett wrote:
[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
[[Neuro-linguistic_programming]] has 259
On 2/10/06, Jake Waskett jake@waskett.org wrote:
At time of writing, [[Medical analysis of circumcision]] has 150 inline refs.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:39 +0100, Steve Bennett wrote:
[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Oy, Neuro-linguistic programming.
k
On 2/10/06, Guettarda guettarda@gmail.com wrote:
[[Neuro-linguistic_programming]] has 259
On 2/10/06, Jake Waskett jake@waskett.org wrote:
At time of writing, [[Medical analysis of circumcision]] has 150 inline refs.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:39 +0100, Steve Bennett wrote:
[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I lack a sufficiently colourful oath to express my reaction. 259!
Steve
On 2/10/06, Guettarda guettarda@gmail.com wrote:
[[Neuro-linguistic_programming]] has 259
If we merge [[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy]] we get 45 + 169 + 54 + 72 + 32 = 372
On 2/10/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
I lack a sufficiently colourful oath to express my reaction. 259!
Steve
On 2/10/06, Guettarda guettarda@gmail.com wrote:
[[Neuro-linguistic_programming]] has 259
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
It seems the next policy must be [[Wikipedia:Avoid over-verifiability]] ([[WP:AOV]])!
Gareth Hughes.
On 10/02/06, Carl Fûrstenberg azatoth@gmail.com wrote:
If we merge [[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy]] we get 45 + 169 + 54 + 72 + 32 = 372
On 2/10/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
I lack a sufficiently colourful oath to express my reaction. 259!
Steve
On 2/10/06, Guettarda guettarda@gmail.com wrote:
[[Neuro-linguistic_programming]] has 259
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 2/10/06, Carl Fûrstenberg azatoth@gmail.com wrote:
If we merge [[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy]] we get 45 + 169 + 54 + 72 + 32 = 372
But how many are duplicates? I would guess that a lot of references would be shared between the articles.
Thread convergence!
On 2/10/06, Guettarda guettarda@gmail.com wrote:
[[Neuro-linguistic_programming]] has 259
On 2/10/06, Jake Waskett jake@waskett.org wrote:
At time of writing, [[Medical analysis of circumcision]] has 150 inline refs.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:39 +0100, Steve Bennett wrote:
[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- ++SJ
On 2/11/06, SJ 2.718281828@gmail.com wrote:
Thread convergence!
On 2/10/06, Guettarda guettarda@gmail.com wrote:
[[Neuro-linguistic_programming]] has 259
On 2/10/06, Jake Waskett jake@waskett.org wrote:
At time of writing, [[Medical analysis of circumcision]] has 150 inline refs.
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 08:39 +0100, Steve Bennett wrote:
[[Katie Holmes]]
85 footnotes and a similar number of "bibliography" entries.
Can anyone top that? :)
The September 11 entries had probably thousands of references; most of them are now hidden here:
http://sep11.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_stories
It was a lot of work compiling these references. Drove me crazy when they were essentially deleted. It was a good object lesson to not take it personally when people don't give a rat's ass about how much work you put into something.