So many times I get frustrated with the bias in the articles. I'm especially frustrated because the problem could be solved so easily. Simply adopt the following policy:

• Any addition to an article, which 1 or more users label as an "NPOV

violation", may be moved from the article into the text page.

• It must not be replaced, until there is sufficient agreement that an

accurate description of the dispute has been crafted.

I don't think this would be a useful policy, or an easy solution to a difficult problem. I think implementing this policy on the Jerusalem page would create inertia to any changes and further enshrine an imperfect status quo that has been haphazardly arrived at.

Forget 3RR. It's mechanical and therefore (nearly) senseless. Let's start using our judgment. We are all smart enough to do that.

Agreed.

Regards, Haukur