and http://washingtonindependent.com/33207/fox-news-gets-punkd-by-obama-birther
David Gerard wrote:
http://gawker.com/5167585/right+wing-writer-invents-his-own-obama-wikipedia-...
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Hah, now WND has scrubbed Jerusalem21's name from their story.
*"Update: March 10, 2009 | 1:40:00 PM*
"This morning the WorldNetDaily story, which is headlined "Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility," was scrubbed clean of the name Jerusalem21, who's now referred to only as "one Wikipedia user." Fortunately, Google cache never forgets http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:Io3pgFeFfMYJ:www.worldnetdaily.com/%3FpageId%3D91114+Jerusalem21&hl=en."
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/03/wikigate-1.html
KillerChihuahua wrote:
and http://washingtonindependent.com/33207/fox-news-gets-punkd-by-obama-birther
David Gerard wrote:
http://gawker.com/5167585/right+wing-writer-invents-his-own-obama-wikipedia-...
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
2009/3/10 David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com:
http://gawker.com/5167585/right+wing-writer-invents-his-own-obama-wikipedia-...
- d.
Doesn't really matter. It's been picked up by larger and somewhat respectable right wing sources (Telegraph) so the truth of the matter has ceased to be of any importance.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91257
Klein has essentially rewritten his post, now stating that the edit was made to the Obama page "as part of the investigation" or some such.
Nathan
This one is funny: http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/03/09/postscript-to-world-net-dailywi...
Can't say I've ever heard of WebProNews before, but this columnist is revising an earlier piece criticising WND. He also says "I tend to think philosophies are prisons robbing us of any great view of reality. That's a rather erudite point we don't need to get into here, my bias against true objectivity which underlies my refusal to compromise how I truly feel." Whew, some writing!
Nathan
<<-----Original Message----- From: Nathan nawrich@gmail.com To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 3:25 pm Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] So much for the Obama scandal
This one is funny: http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/03/09/postscript-to-world-net-dailywi...
Can't say I've ever heard of WebProNews before, but this columnist is revising an earlier piece criticising WND. He also says "I tend to think philosophies are prisons robbing us of any great view of reality. That's a rather erudite point we don't need to get into here, my bias against true objectivity which underlies my refusal to compromise how I truly feel." Whew, some writing!
Nathan>> -------------------------------------- Exactly. "Thinking" is counter-productive. Workers must work and not think. Leave the thinking to the Think Department. "Feeling" is good, as long as Feeling is moderated by the desire to produce.
Be Happy. Produce.
Will "This message brought to you by the George Orwell Society" Johnson
I don't think I'd trust any website calling themselves "WebProNews". Sounds more like an adware suite than a reputable media outlet.
- Chris
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:05 PM, wjhonson@aol.com wrote:
<<-----Original Message----- From: Nathan nawrich@gmail.com To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 3:25 pm Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] So much for the Obama scandal
This one is funny:
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/03/09/postscript-to-world-net-dailywi...
Can't say I've ever heard of WebProNews before, but this columnist is revising an earlier piece criticising WND. He also says "I tend to think philosophies are prisons robbing us of any great view of reality. That's a rather erudite point we don't need to get into here, my bias against true objectivity which underlies my refusal to compromise how I truly feel." Whew, some writing!
Nathan>>
Exactly. "Thinking" is counter-productive. Workers must work and not think. Leave the thinking to the Think Department. "Feeling" is good, as long as Feeling is moderated by the desire to produce.
Be Happy. Produce.
Will "This message brought to you by the George Orwell Society" Johnson
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
geni wrote:
2009/3/10 David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com:
http://gawker.com/5167585/right+wing-writer-invents-his-own-obama-wikipedia-...
- d.
Doesn't really matter. It's been picked up by larger and somewhat respectable right wing sources (Telegraph) so the truth of the matter has ceased to be of any importance.
Interesting ... last I heard the world economy was in meltdown, there is no free-market solution in sight yet, and state intervention is running out of zeroes. And what really interests the media is stories about other smaller parts of the media dreamed up by microscopic portions of the media ... about the person on whose desk the buck has apparently stopped. So at least the focus is squarely on Mr Obama's economic competence - not.
Charles
2009/3/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com:
Interesting ... last I heard the world economy was in meltdown, there is no free-market solution in sight yet, and state intervention is running out of zeroes. And what really interests the media is stories about other smaller parts of the media dreamed up by microscopic portions of the media ... about the person on whose desk the buck has apparently stopped. So at least the focus is squarely on Mr Obama's economic competence - not.
Charles
It's coverage in the actual media rather than blogs isn't very widespread. It is however cheap and easy to write so there is a significant incentive for media organisations to pick it up. similar to the reason it can be rather hard to find out about day to day events outside the more heavily industrialised notations.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
It's coverage in the actual media rather than blogs isn't very widespread. It is however cheap and easy to write so there is a significant incentive for media organisations to pick it up.
And the media loves to talk about the media, because to those making it, it's "the world" they live in.
-Matt
2009/3/11 Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
It's coverage in the actual media rather than blogs isn't very widespread. It is however cheap and easy to write so there is a significant incentive for media organisations to pick it up.
And the media loves to talk about the media, because to those making it, it's "the world" they live in.
They can eat their own most amusingly, however:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/11/1236447270592.html
- d.
Great people talk about ideas. Mediocre people talk about events. Poor people talk about other people. --Eleanor Roosevelt