"Alex Rosen" <arosen(a)novell.com> schrieb:
"Wikipedia is not paper, but it is also not a
collection place
for trivia. It remains an encyclopedia, which remains that we do have
to
have some limits on what is and what is not interesting."
Here's how I interpret Jimbo's stance: "Wikipedia 1.0" (the eventual
edited version) will be an encyclopedia, but Wikipedia is not now
actually an encyclopedia. And to get to the eventual 1.0 version, it's
better to encourage contributors, even if that means that a lot of
non-encyclopedic content is added, because this kind of inclusionist
policy will encourage more encyclopedic content as well (by not pissing
people off by deleting things that they write).
I don't know if that's true, but I think his view on this is important,
and I'm tired of arguing about this (both here and on VfD), and I think
we need a firm policy. And I'm OK with this policy.
It's a point of view, but I don't share it. In my opinion, we should try to get
Wikipedia be as much of an encyclopedia as possible. Having a stable and published
version will be interesting, but to me Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that we are making.
Andre Engels