It seems that your the point man on this, Mike. To my
eye the one that stands out is Encyclozine --
apparently "powered by e-library" It has a staff of
writers, and seems intent on making a name for itself
and the furthest it goes for crediting wikipedia is a
little tag at the bottom of the authors page.
"We have adopted several articles from Wikipedia, a
multilingual project to create a complete and accurate
open content encyclopedia. Our appreciation and thanks
go to the many authors."
Thats almost as good as:
(From Din Cyclopedia) "This is how it works. First it
pulls content from
WIkipedia.com. ..This content is
then altered slightly so that links will remain local.
But most importantly, this content is only pulled one
time, then it is stored locally and from that point
the wikipedia server is no longered bothered by this
site....The Din Cyclopedia tecnically is the
wikipedia, but somethings need to be explained about
the later..."
-S-
--- Michael Becker <wikipedia(a)jumpingjackweb.com>
wrote:
It has been discussed (here:
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Sites_that_use_Wikipedia_for_c…)
that the gfdl notice on the bottom of every page
needs updating. The following notice is the result
of the discussion "All text is available under the
terms of the [[Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free
Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation
License]]. See [[Wikipedia:Copyrights]] for
suggested practices." I would like to request that
as long as no one has any more suggestion to make on
the talk page, this new notice be instituted ASAP.
Also, the "Printable version" pages need to have the
same notice (currently they don't).
--
Michael Becker
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com