It seems that your the point man on this, Mike. To my eye the one that stands out is Encyclozine -- apparently "powered by e-library" It has a staff of writers, and seems intent on making a name for itself and the furthest it goes for crediting wikipedia is a little tag at the bottom of the authors page. "We have adopted several articles from Wikipedia, a multilingual project to create a complete and accurate open content encyclopedia. Our appreciation and thanks go to the many authors."

Thats almost as good as:

(From Din Cyclopedia) "This is how it works. First it pulls content from WIkipedia.com. ..This content is then altered slightly so that links will remain local. But most importantly, this content is only pulled one time, then it is stored locally and from that point the wikipedia server is no longered bothered by this site....The Din Cyclopedia tecnically is the wikipedia, but somethings need to be explained about the later..."

-S-

--- Michael Becker wikipedia@jumpingjackweb.com wrote:

It has been discussed (here:

http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Sites_that_use_Wikipedia_for_co...)

that the gfdl notice on the bottom of every page needs updating. The following notice is the result of the discussion "All text is available under the terms of the [[Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]]. See [[Wikipedia:Copyrights]] for suggested practices." I would like to request that as long as no one has any more suggestion to make on the talk page, this new notice be instituted ASAP. Also, the "Printable version" pages need to have the same notice (currently they don't).

-- Michael Becker

---

WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com