And you through your repeated and completely unwarranted inflammatory comments about a person who has done far more for Wikipedia than you have are trying to start a flame-war. No current policy or even community standard of acceptability prevented Erik from reverting admin action once and even when there is policy it is extremely unlikely that desysoping and indefinite banning accompanied by refusal to discuss will be prescribed as punishment. Let's not bury the real issue over the separate discussion about wheel-war (there are several peoposed policy pages for that).

We are talking about whether Danny was justified in his actions. I believe everyone except Kelly (and possibly Danny) believes he was not. Kelly not only believes his actions to be justified, but also believes that Erik should still be banned for a crime he did not commit. To advance her position, she repeatedly makes inflammatory comments about Erik without basis that on a wiki talk page would have been deleted for being violations of NPA and AGF.

She also feels herself to be more equal than other admins and qualified to pass judgments on whether admins elected to that position through community consensus about their fitness are deserving and wthether they should be desysoped.

Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:44:06 -0500 From: "Kelly Martin"

Except he wasn't an Wikipedian in good standing; he had attempted to start a wheel war.

Kelly

--------------------------------- Celebrate Earth Day everyday! Discover 10 things you can do to help slow climate change. Yahoo! Earth Day