In a message dated 4/9/2009 10:21:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, smoddy@gmail.com writes:
"Sanger and most media sources consider Wales and Sanger co-founders.[cite][cite][cite] Wales disputes it, saying that, although Sanger played a vital part in the formation of Wikipedia and his role is regularly underestimated, Wales alone should be considered the founder.</cite>">>
-------------------------
Currently the Wikipedia article doesn't seem to mention this controversy whatsoever, and consistently calls Sanger co-founder.
Will Johnson
**************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001)
In a message dated 4/9/2009 10:21:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, smoddy@gmail.com writes:
"Sanger and most media sources consider Wales and Sanger co-founders.[cite][cite][cite] Wales disputes it, saying that, although Sanger played a vital part in the formation of Wikipedia and his role is regularly underestimated, Wales alone should be considered the founder.</cite>">>
Currently the Wikipedia article doesn't seem to mention this controversy whatsoever, and consistently calls Sanger co-founder.
Will Johnson
That is good enough. Original research by Jimmy Wales is no better than anyone elses.
Fred