Anthony mentioned the idea of "a certain user [being] the accepted dictator of a page" and I'd like to comment. No one may assume ownership of an ordinary article, even if they have acknowledged expertise in the field to which it pertains: science, history, etc. I have just as much right to edit math articles as Axelboldt does, for example. But apparently we've given the job of choosing the "featured article" to one particular user. I sure don't want the job, and I think he's been pretty good at making his picks, so I have given my, er, "tacit consent". So have a lot of other people, so there has apparently been a "consensus" that he's in charge of that selection. If Anthony wants to have a turn occasionally, why not? I think it was poor form to TAKE a turn without prior discussion and to FORCE the issue with multiple reverts. But that doesn't mean he should be forever barred from making a Featured Article Choice. Perhaps it's time to consider allowing other people to submit recommendations, or even to take a turn (say, a week or a month at a time) in the role of Chooser, eh? Ed Poor Bureaucrat