Again, I hold that the "review club"
should be very open to all
comers,
just as the "edit club". We may choose a more disciplined approach
within the "review club" and be more harsh about disturbances, but we
absolutely should not ask for (and entrants should not mention their)
academic qualifications at the doorstep. Their ''actual writing''
should be their sole guarantor. With reference to this post:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-September/
030499.html
If renowned academic Alice cannot conclusively prove and defend her
view of things and layman Bob can, then we should follow Bob. We
should
NOT believe something is right just because "the right people" say it.
That's a reverse ad-hominem. Go read the [[ad hominem]] article. Do it
now:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem