Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:46:23 -0700 From: "K P" kpbotany@gmail.com Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] An academic survey about the intention of sharing knowledge in the Wikipedia To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: e30db1db0706081346g722bf6d0k8a3776c21b3a4b52@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 6/8/07, Nick Wilkins nlwilkins@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/8/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
It works fine for me, Fred. The ) isn't included in the link. What I wondered is why they called it "the Wikipedia".
Mgm
What I wondered is why they called it "Wikipedia" the first time, and
"the
Wikipedia" the second time.
-- Jonel
Maybe because most languages don't use articles and they are a hurdle for those speaking English as a Second Language. My grandfather wrote a book, many scientific articles and a famous monograph in English, but never mastered the use of articles in English, a second language to him, so all of his writings contain irregularities in the use of articles--even though German was one of his first languages and uses an article.
This is common among speakers of ESL, irregular usage of articles.
KP
Thanks for the suggestion. I have tried to identify and correct the
confusing statement in the questionnaire before the survey was administered. But as KP pointed out, English is not my native language, and therefore, the confusing statement may still exist due to my English is not good enough. Does anybody know where can I find more subjects?
Cheng-Yu
Does anybody know where can I find more subjects?
Isn't it normal to plan surveys before conducting them? And wouldn't that planning usually involve determining the best ways to find the desired range of subjects? Asking your subjects if they have any friends who could help out 4 days after announcing the survey doesn't seem very professional to me...