In a message dated 5/21/2008 12:57:52 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, morven@gmail.com writes:
The specifics of this instance seem to indicate that Eleemosynary was being deliberately uncivil and disruptive by doing so and it was part of a general pattern of such behavior.>>>
-------------------
I don't think I disagreed with that assessment, but in general we do not handle that by an indef.
The specific reason for the indef was mentioning Durova's real name, and thus that is the sole issue I brought, so we could discuss it. The entire year-long history muddies the waters and we cannot focus on the one issue in which I was interested.
Will Johnson
**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:04 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
I don't think I disagreed with that assessment, but in general we do not handle that by an indef.
The specific reason for the indef was mentioning Durova's real name, and thus that is the sole issue I brought, so we could discuss it. The entire year-long history muddies the waters and we cannot focus on the one issue in which I was interested.
I suspect, though, even if not specifically stated, the history of behavior was part of the reasoning behind the decision on that block length.
-Matt