RK wrote in part:
I am amazed that MNH's highly disturbing behaviour
is being
defended by so many, or at least ignored by so many.
You're amazed every time, it seems, when people excuse bad behaviour
from biased contributors -- like EoT or MNH -- that you tangle with.
I don't think that it's a good thing -- as I wrote on MNH's talk page,
he isn't helping the encyclopedia one bit -- but I understand why.
Ironically, it's in your signature every day:
"I prefer a wicked person who knows he is wicked,
to a righteous person who knows he is righteous".
The Seer of Lublin [Jacob Isaac Ha-Hozeh Mi-Lublin, 1745-1815]
With comments like «If you ban me, then I'll come back on other IPs.»
and «I am a Nazi.», I'd say that MNH knows he is wicked, wouldn't you?
Which reminds me (to everybody):
Has anybody with that power checked the IP logs for MNH's edits
to see if this might be somebody that we've met before?
He was quick to point to the weaknesses of our banning procedures
and seemed to understand the political wisdom of focusing on RK.
-- Toby