Sheldon,
You are miscontruing nearly everything I've said. It has the effect of putting words in my mouth.
You then use these words in strawman arguments to disparage my character.
I don't know why you're doing this. We are not enemies. I have no books, no website, no POV axe to grind.
I am 100% for NPOV. I do not ask the Wikipedia to endorse any of my pet projects or favorite ideas. I am not a scientist or politician or lobbyist.
I only want to describe each side of controversial issues fairly. Oftentimes, advocates overstate their own case. I _hate_ it when this happens, and I am mortified any time I discover I have done it myself.
Please don't consider me an enemy. You and I are not opponents, unless you choose to oppose NPOV itself.
I will continue to try as hard as I can to overcome my own bias when writing on controversial subjects on which I have strong opinions.
I will not issue unilateral temporary bans on egregious bans, and you would be just as wrong to suggest I would do such a thing as I would be to accuse you of plotting to murder me. (BTW, you're not plotting that, are you? ;-)
--- "Poor, Edmund W" Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com wrote:
I am 100% for NPOV. I do not ask the Wikipedia to endorse any of my pet projects or favorite ideas. I am not a scientist or politician or lobbyist.
Please don't call opposing views "Junk science", then.
I only want to describe each side of controversial issues fairly. Oftentimes, advocates overstate their own case. I _hate_ it when this happens, and I am mortified any time I discover I have done it myself.
What if you leave what's there and just add "However, others say that..." so that all sides are represented, even the ones that you say are representing the facts wrong. LDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com