Alphax wrote ...
You mean whether it's plain sense or not? No, it's not. It's actually /more/ POV than BC/AD is, because it makes the *assertion* that the Birth of Jesus, whether is Christ, Lord, Prophet or otherwise, is *common* to *all* cultures - it's Western Imperialism and Political Correctness at its worst.
You have a right to believe this, as you have a right to disagree with my proposal. But it is clear that you didn't read my proposal, since I argue against the interpretation you present, and provide a different explanation.
I disagree with LOTS of people, but I listen to what they say and try to respond (indeed, I mention several other editors in my proposal because I listened carefully to what they said, thought about it, and wanted to explain to them why I disagree with them, even considering their own arguments).
It is a shame that Alphax won't do this.
According to our policy: "The first resort in resolving almost any conflict is to discuss the issue ...Take the other person's perspective into account and try to reach a compromise."
I have tried to do this with every person who opposes my proposal. Sometimes I get impatient, and in three or four cases, rude. Other times the other person gets hostile and rude. But even then, I try to listen to their arguments, and respond to what they actually said.
I wish Alphax chose to follow this route, rather than the ones/he chose.
Steve
Steven L. Rubenstein Associate Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology Bentley Annex Ohio University Athens, Ohio 45701
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, at 15:11, steven l. rubenstein rubenste@ohiou.edu wrote:
Alphax wrote ...
You mean whether it's plain sense or not? No, it's not. It's actually /more/ POV than BC/AD is, because it makes the *assertion* that the Birth of Jesus, whether is Christ, Lord, Prophet or otherwise, is *common* to *all* cultures - it's Western Imperialism and Political Correctness at its worst.
You have a right to believe this, as you have a right to disagree with my proposal. But it is clear that you didn't read my proposal, since I argue against the interpretation you present, and provide a different explanation.
No, SLR, this doesn't logically follow; I am of the same (or, at least, similar) beliefs as Alphax on this issue, which is that cloaking the Jesus-based calender behind more 'PC' terms is the exact opposite of NPOV, attempting to hide the western imperialism with a sop to 'minorities'. I have read your suggestion, and yes, you do mention this, but I disagree with your argument (and yes - before you suggest this, as you have done before - I did understand it).
Just because someone reads your argument doesn't mean that they agree with it. Honest.
[Snip rambling]
Yours,