On 10/07/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 10 Jul 2007 at 00:59:34 +0100, "Andrew
Gray" <shimgray(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The one that always amazes me is how many legal
firms think it's
helpful to send a raw .doc or .pdf file without even putting a
sentence in the email to say what it's about... very irritating by the
tenth time around.
Given that I've been getting a whole rash of spam lately that
consists of unexplained PDF attachments (something that seems to get
right through Bayesian spam filters because there are no plaintext
keywords to filter on), any such things are likely to be trashed
unopened by me.
There's usually a lengthy signature (name, contact details, name of
the firm, sixteen lines of "if you receive this by accident then
destroy your computer and sterilise your children", etc, which helps
distinguish it from random junk. 'Course, if someone is willing to
fake those... actually, that's a pretty cunning idea.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk