I never actually read the article, so I can't really make an informed judgment on its worthiness for inclusion. However, judging by the AFD discussion. it was an incredibly incomplete list of songs containing profanity, didn't exactly follow naming conventions, and was incredibly unencyclopedic.
The AFD was closed out-of-process, true, but in this case I'm not convinced that's entirely a bad thing. It was unanimous to delete it (although, granted, the AFD wasn't even up for 24 hours), and there were some incredibly sound arguments involved in that discussion.
Ron Ritzman wrote:
[[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Profanity_in_songs]]
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 20/05/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
I never actually read the article, so I can't really make an informed judgment on its worthiness for inclusion. However, judging by the AFD discussion. it was an incredibly incomplete list of songs containing profanity, didn't exactly follow naming conventions, and was incredibly unencyclopedic.
The AFD was closed out-of-process, true, but in this case I'm not convinced that's entirely a bad thing. It was unanimous to delete it (although, granted, the AFD wasn't even up for 24 hours), and there were some incredibly sound arguments involved in that discussion.
And the result of the discussion was amusing :)
On 5/20/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
The AFD was closed out-of-process, true, but in this case I'm not convinced that's entirely a bad thing. It was unanimous to delete it (although, granted, the AFD wasn't even up for 24 hours), and there were some incredibly sound arguments involved in that discussion.
You're probably right, I just like to point out humorous AFD closes. However, it wouldn't surprise me if someone did bring it to DRV based on the closing admin's comments.
Blu Aardvark wrote:
I never actually read the article, so I can't really make an informed judgment on its worthiness for inclusion. However, judging by the AFD discussion. it was an incredibly incomplete list of songs containing profanity, didn't exactly follow naming conventions, and was incredibly unencyclopedic.
The AFD was closed out-of-process, true, but in this case I'm not convinced that's entirely a bad thing. It was unanimous to delete it (although, granted, the AFD wasn't even up for 24 hours), and there were some incredibly sound arguments involved in that discussion.
I certainly don't have any problem with this deletion (but then again I did "vote" delete). This is the kind of stuff [[WP:SNOW]] was written for.