2009/12/21 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd(a)lomaxdesign.com>om>:
The article was likely overstated. However, the editor
have a substantial history of using administrative tools with respect
to global warming and related articles, as well as extensive editing
in the area, taking a consistent position, supporting a consistent
point of view. I encountered this myself when I helped avoid the
deletion of an RfC that was written by Raul654, certified by WMC,
then it was noticed that Raul had not certified it. Then I read the
RfC and was horrified, and that was the beginning of my involvement
with WMC and others active with the global warming article.
This is the one you were taken to arbitration over, and was the source
of your proposal that experts be banned from editing articles on their
Global warming nutters are really special.