http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20080119%5E15318%5E%5Enbv%5E...
A DETECTIVE involved in the prosecution of 13 accused terrorists has told a court he gleaned much of his knowledge of terrorism from the internet and admits he's no expert on the subject.
"The witness said he had used internet resources like Google and Wikipedia to research terrorism and Muslim extremists."
In order to maintain the NPOV, we certainly need an islamic terrorist to testify that he used Wikipedia for his evil purposes, right?
NPOV is about the content of the article, not who is using it.
On 8/10/06, Mathias Schindler mathias.schindler@gmail.com wrote:
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20080119%5E15318%5E%5Enbv%5E...
A DETECTIVE involved in the prosecution of 13 accused terrorists has told a court he gleaned much of his knowledge of terrorism from the internet and admits he's no expert on the subject.
"The witness said he had used internet resources like Google and Wikipedia to research terrorism and Muslim extremists."
In order to maintain the NPOV, we certainly need an islamic terrorist to testify that he used Wikipedia for his evil purposes, right? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 8/10/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
NPOV is about the content of the article, not who is using it.
right. I was confusing it with some bizarre concept of "balance of power" ...
You're no fun at all.
On 8/10/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
NPOV is about the content of the article, not who is using it.
On 8/10/06, Mathias Schindler mathias.schindler@gmail.com wrote:
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20080119%5E15318%5E%5Enbv%5E...
A DETECTIVE involved in the prosecution of 13 accused terrorists has told a court he gleaned much of his knowledge of terrorism from the internet and admits he's no expert on the subject.
"The witness said he had used internet resources like Google and Wikipedia to research terrorism and Muslim extremists."
In order to maintain the NPOV, we certainly need an islamic terrorist to testify that he used Wikipedia for his evil purposes, right? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
The Cunctator wrote:
On 8/10/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/10/06, Mathias Schindler mathias.schindler@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
In order to maintain the NPOV, we certainly need an islamic terrorist to testify that he used Wikipedia for his evil purposes, right?
NPOV is about the content of the article, not who is using it.
You're no fun at all.
4-clause BSD license with "This material may not be used for evil"?