Why? Arbcom largely decides how to handle personality disputes, and in the process must deal somewhat with applications of principle -neutrality being first among them. It seems to be popular belief that the Arbcom is understaffed relative to Wikipedia size, anyway. As a consequence, it seems to only thinly treat its duty to be treat each specific point/issue/claim, and in turn this means that its rulings offer only a decree, and show little about the thinking process. Of course, things are open to discussion, but IAC, NPOV is clear enough for a committee to deal with regard to its application to certain points, and is separate from personality issues. Growth often means diversification. SV --- Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote: __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com