On 28 Aug 2007 at 13:01:26 +0100, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it?
I occasionally play devil's advocate You are a troll He has been placed on moderation
Or, when discussing external sites that criticize Wikipedia:
My site has reasonable, legitimate criticism. Your site is full of dubious, misguided critiques. His site is an evil attack site... ban it!
On 29/08/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 28 Aug 2007 at 13:01:26 +0100, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it?
I occasionally play devil's advocate You are a troll He has been placed on moderation
Or, when discussing external sites that criticize Wikipedia:
My site has reasonable, legitimate criticism. Your site is full of dubious, misguided critiques. His site is an evil attack site... ban it!
It seems to me that it may be more like:
The site that criticises him/her/them has reasonable, legitimate criticism. The site that criticises you is full of dubious, misguided critiques. The site that criticised me/us is an evil attack site: ban it!
On 29/08/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
The site that criticised me/us is an evil attack site: ban it!
s/criticised/criticises... :(