Actually, I think that you should assume good faith. I am not the one making a fuss about this, I am going about the business of improving the encyclopedia. Closely checking edits of other users is part of that. I really don't understand why you are so afraid of scrutiny. Oh wait, yes I do. The Recycling Troll
--- Tony Sidaway minorityreport@bluebottle.com wrote:
Recycling Troll said:
Well, the case that you're making seems to be that admins are never wrong, it is an afront to check
their
edits
I don't believe that. However we have a guideline of "assume good faith" which your _modus operandi_ of closely shadowing another editor, with your stated objective, may be violating. You seem to be playing this thing out as a game of sociodynamics. If that's what you're interested in doing, you might find that other, less focussed communities are more accommodating.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Oh wait, yes I do. The Recycling Troll
There is obviously a case for not recycling trolls, as well as denying them nourishment. I take it they walk out of landfills; perhaps a deep ocean trench, or one of the less popular moons of Saturn.
Charles