I won't argue against that but I know that others won't take your position.
As an aside, regarding the fact backlog I do plan on writing a tool
tommorrow or Thursday (whenever toolserver comes back up and I fix a
few other tools) that will list all articles by category that are both
ib the blp category and have a fact tag on it. It is my hope that once
the tool is written we can direct subject specialists to help us
source what they know... Folks in Canada can source Canadian
politicians, etc.
On 12/31/08, WJhonson(a)aol.com <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 12/30/2008 9:35:23 PM Pacific Standard Time,
wilhelm(a)nixeagle.org writes:
Right but nobody will know to check back on the article. Generally
articles are monitored by watching the rc feeds, at least that is what
I used to do.>>
-------------------------------------------
The rate of new article creation is trivial compared to the mass of bytes
we
already have.
In my mind, there is not, and never was, any need for anyone to monitor new
article creation.
Those eyes could be much better served on the old {{fact}} list.
We have a backlog *exceeding* one year.
That, imho, is far more important, than catching a one sentence stub.
Will Johnson
**************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail,
Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now.
(
http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaol…)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l