On 11 Oct 2007 at 12:44:58 -0700, William Pietri william@scissor.com wrote:
John has raised a legitimate question, one also unanswered in my mind. You respond by impugning his character and/or his judgement -- in my view, without cause or benefit. However reasonable it is to try to suppress potentially harmful information on a small scale, your good intentions have led you into a reductio ad absurdum position where you are trying to suppress it on ever-larger scales.
"I frequently make the assertion that it's impossible to successfully censor the Internet by trying to remove materials that have already been posted publicly after they've attracted attention. What's published is published, what's done is done. The genie won't just refuse to go back into the bottle, he'll stick his tongue out at you as well -- or worse." -- Lauren Weinstein http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000279.html
On 10/11/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
"I frequently make the assertion that it's impossible to successfully censor the Internet by trying to remove materials that have already been posted publicly after they've attracted attention. What's published is published, what's done is done. The genie won't just refuse to go back into the bottle, he'll stick his tongue out at you as well -- or worse." -- Lauren Weinstein http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000279.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
—C.W.