Where you say that you aren't sure that there are any Wikipedians who could write a neutral article about Brandt... I think that you are vastly overestimating the number of Wikipedians who even keep up with the whole Brandt/WR saga. Don't get me wrong, I think lots of Wikipedians know about it, I just think that most don't really care. I frankly have no opinion one way or the other on the guy. I think that the people who attack Brandt because they think they have a right to privacy or confidentiality are deceiving themselves, since editing what is essentially a public document sort of makes each Wikipedian a public figure, if only in a microscopic way. In any event, I am sure there are plenty of editors who could do the research, interpret the sources, and render a pretty reasonably accurate bio of Brandt. Do you really think that every Wikipedian is following this story? DickClarkMises Message: 7 <snip> Those all seem like creative and possibly acceptable solutions, at