Anthere claims "I will be clear. RK and I disagreed on two things. He wanted one article while I wanted 2. Now there is only one. Point for him. Me out."

This is false. No Gaia articles have been delted. Her claims to the contrary are totally false, and I can't understand how she thinks she can get away with fooling all of you. Just check out the Wikipedia for yourself! All the Gaia articles are still there. Is Anthere's web-browser accessing some alternate form of Wikipedia that the rest of us don't have access to?

Anthere claims "He wanted to remove non scientific view, politics and such from the article, when I claim it was important they be there. Now, only science is left. point for him. Me out."

Untrue. In fact, this is an easily exposed falsehood. All I did was use standard Wikipedia disambiguation, to make clear that mystical, political and religious views that she wants to call Gaia theory are not confused with scientific theories.

Contrary to her odd claims, all of Anthere's material is still there. In fact, I added discussions of non-science opics to a science-based article, and made a few links to non-science articles, for the sole purpose of appeasing Anthere. Didn't work. Now she doesn't even admit that her work is still on the Wikipedia.

It is difficult to work with someone who repeatedly makes false claims, and who has a persecution complex. The rest of you, however, can see the articles for yourself, and you can evaluate and comment on the proposed disambiguation that was sent to this list; it was also put on the Discussion pages.

Robert (RK)

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com