A particular dispute over a Wikinews reporter citing quotes from his own interview has turned into a generalized debate about when Wikinews should be an acceptable source. See this RS/N thread.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Wikinews:_Please_post_definite_answer
Jimbo has suggested that Wikinews create a best practices document. BP-compliant articles would be verifiable and thus should be available to Wikipedia editors as a reliable source. See this Wikinews water cooler threadhttp://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Water_cooler/miscellaneous#I_want_to_help.3B_how_you_can_help_me_help .
I think that this is a great solution, which would answer the continual objections that Wikinews faces on our project. However, more editors should weigh in.
Regards, User:Cool Hand Luke
I'm tempted to answer that with never. Too much room for abuse, which the BP may or may not solve. We wouldn't know until the BP document is made and tested to prove it works. Until then, and after, a better option may be to limit it to the wikinews articles that are first cited by other reliable sources. Until then, it may as well be the White House encyclopedia citing White House press releases.
--- Cool Hand Luke failure.to.communicate@gmail.com wrote:
A particular dispute over a Wikinews reporter citing quotes from his own interview has turned into a generalized debate about when Wikinews should be an acceptable source. See this RS/N
Jimbo has suggested that Wikinews create a best practices document. BP-compliant articles would be verifiable and thus should be available to Wikipedia editors as a reliable source. See this Wikinews water cooler
.
I think that this is a great solution, which would answer the continual objections that Wikinews faces on our project. However, more editors should weigh in.
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
This is an interesting question. For example is an interview by a wikinews person a reliable source? I'd say perhaps... :/
- White Cat
On Dec 25, 2007 3:36 AM, Cool Hand Luke failure.to.communicate@gmail.com wrote:
A particular dispute over a Wikinews reporter citing quotes from his own interview has turned into a generalized debate about when Wikinews should be an acceptable source. See this RS/N thread.< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Wikinews...
Jimbo has suggested that Wikinews create a best practices document. BP-compliant articles would be verifiable and thus should be available to Wikipedia editors as a reliable source. See this Wikinews water cooler thread< http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Water_cooler/miscellaneous#I_want_to_he...
.
I think that this is a great solution, which would answer the continual objections that Wikinews faces on our project. However, more editors should weigh in.
Regards, User:Cool Hand Luke _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On 26/12/2007, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
This is an interesting question. For example is an interview by a wikinews person a reliable source? I'd say perhaps... :/
I believe most of the people we have doing these are perfectly competent and trusted, so sure.
Even if they're entirely unknown to us, an interview is probably about as reliable a source as an undergraduate newspaper, and we happily quote those...