2009/9/5 <WJhonson(a)aol.com>om>:
In a message dated 9/5/2009 1:18:07 PM Pacific
Daylight Time,
thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com writes:
Contract violation *is* illegal. (Assuming a
website ToS is a binding
contract - has that ever been tested in court?)>>
Piffle. Who is going to sue? Who has standing to sue?
I really see this as a non-starter.
Either Google or the publisher/author of the book you viewed. People
get sued for bypassing DRM, why couldn't they be sued for bypassing
restrictions on Google books?