1. The arbitration committee instructs Anthony to refrain from playing around and making provocative edits on VfD and associated pages"
Which is pretty clear. That Anthony has apparently ignored a direct instruction is a matter of regret, and would have reflected badly on him had the case proceeded to arbitration. This is perhaps why, during mediation, he agreed to accept the following standing order:
[[Wikipedia:Requests_for_Arbitration/Standing_orders/Anthony]]
If Anthony should, for any reason, make a provocative edit (that is, an edit which is "trolling", "disruptive", and/or "antisocial" as interpreted by an admin) or engage in an edit war, an admin, may at his discretion, block Anthony for a period of 24 hours, not subject to the normal warnings and protections afforded other users.
I for one congratulate the mediation committee in their success in reaching an agreement on this case, that has allowed Raul654 to rapidly and robustly deal with the issue, pending further discussion. I hope that mediation will continue to resolve many similar issues without resorting to arbitration.
-Martin
Martin Harper wrote:
I for one congratulate the mediation committee in their success in reaching an agreement on this case, that has allowed Raul654 to rapidly and robustly deal with the issue, pending further discussion. I hope that mediation will continue to resolve many similar issues without resorting to arbitration.
For the record, it was Fennec and not Raul654 who blocked Anthony:
20:03, 2 Aug 2004 Fennec blocked "Anthony DiPierro" with an expiry time of 24 hours (Per [[Wikipedia:Requests for Arbitration/Standing orders/Anthony]] as applies to the listing of Boston meetup pictures on VFD)
FIn