Ok, that post was totally off topic. You're on
moderation now.
That seems unduly harsh for one post which your personal opinion judges
off-topic
Ec
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Jay Litwyn
<brewhaha(a)freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> wrote:
>
http://ecn.ab.ca/~brewhaha/Sound/MSixths.mp3
> DATA 35,27,2,24,40,6,45,27,2,30,50,4
> DATA 55,33,2,36,60,4,65,39,4,42,70,4,0,0,4
> ' How is it that the above numbers, which approximate the western scale,
> ' in stereo, in parts a constant major sixth (5:3) apart...
> DATA 60,35,2,30,40,6,54,45,2,27,50,4
> DATA 54,55,2,48,60,4,54,65,4,60,70,4,0,0,8
> sound a lot like the above series?
> Hint: you need to multiply all of them by 66/35 to render them.
> Complete source (or the equivalent in a key for ladies) available upon
> request.
> I like the first series better, because both parts are more interesting than
> the scale, while in the second version, one part basically is Doh-Ray-Mee.
>
>
>
>