I agree with you ed. wik needs a to take a break from wiki, my suggestion is warn him. If he continues to act foolish ban him.
"Poor, Edmund W" Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com wrote: If Wik is really making unprovoked abusive comments, perhaps we should do a bit more to rein him in. We have been struggling to establish a process for this.
I'm open to suggestions!
Ed Poor _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
Here why i feel wik should be warned:
A) He has broken the three revert rule many times,
B) his hate list on main page (I was on the list :-) personally don't care, however some users could view as a personal attack)
C) he is very rude.
D) i heard (although i have no proof) he uses sock puppets.
I feel only a stern warning is good wik because we don't necessarily have a "cut and dry banning case" such as in Michael's and 24's
"N.T. Riche" vonriche@yahoo.com wrote: I agree with you ed. wik needs a to take a break from wiki, my suggestion is warn him. If he continues to act foolish ban him.
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.