Viajero wrote:
Adam Carr demonstrated on articles like [[Anti-zionism]] that it seems to make a huge difference if ONE individual takes charge of the article with no particular authority except the confidence of other contributors. Adam is by no means impartial (who is?) but he has a gift for synthesizing various POVs into an effective, well- written organic whole.
I think this will work for any topic, provided an individual can be found who can win the confidence of the other contributors. I myself have managed to gain a degree of trust at [[Silesia]], and I have hopes that it may be sufficient to enable me to do in the Balkans what Viajeron suggests for the Middle East.
Ed Poor, aka Uncle Ed
Poor, Edmund W wrote:
Viajero wrote:
Adam Carr demonstrated on articles like [[Anti-zionism]] that it seems to make a huge difference if ONE individual takes charge of the article with no particular authority except the confidence of other contributors. Adam is by no means impartial (who is?) but he has a gift for synthesizing various POVs into an effective, well- written organic whole.
I think this will work for any topic, provided an individual can be found who can win the confidence of the other contributors. I myself have managed to gain a degree of trust at [[Silesia]], and I have hopes that it may be sufficient to enable me to do in the Balkans what Viajeron suggests for the Middle East.
Agreed. To gain that confidence you need to be seen as listening to both sides of the dispute. It's an approach that is superior to the VfD process. Starting a discussion with "I want to delete your article." does not promote a collaborative approach to the problem. It brings out defensive attitudes.
Ec
Viajero wrote:
Adam Carr demonstrated on articles like
[[Anti-zionism]] that it
seems to make a huge difference if ONE individual
takes charge of
the article with no particular authority except
the confidence of
other contributors. Adam is by no means impartial
(who is?) but he
has a gift for synthesizing various POVs into an
effective, well-
written organic whole.
Ed replied:
I think this will work for any topic, provided an individual can be found who can win the confidence of the other contributors.
I reply: This is quite correct, but it is also temporary. As soon as the respected moderating person goes away, the fighting will flare up and by the end of the first good edit war the results of all that hard work will have been swept away. I suggest that my proposed change would make this (slightly) less likely to happen.
Zero
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus