Recently I have noticed some redirects like {{NYCS stub}} to {{NYCS-stub}} listed on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion . The stub sorters, typically the only people to frequent SFD, are voting for their deletion on the grounds that they are "incorrectly named". What? That is in fact NOT a reason to delete a redirect. I don't think template redirects even have the performance problem of nested templates; there is no reason to delete these redirects. If someone wants them deleted, they can be listed on [[WP:RFD]] like all other redirects. Grutness now says I'm vandalizing SFD by removing the redirects and his change in the scop[e of the page to include redirects. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASPUI&diff=2614617… http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion… (and the rest of the recent history of SFD)